Odd Man Out (1947)
Directed by Carol Reed
116 min.; United Kingdom; Black and White; Mono
After viewing Carol Reed's atmospheric crime drama Odd Man Out (1947) I'm convinced that the director's first major post-war feature is every bit as visually rich and engrossing as its more famous sibling, The Third Man (1949), if not even more so. In the film Johnny McQueen (James Mason), the fugitive chief of an "illegal organization" (read: the Irish Republican Army) operating in "a city of Northern Ireland" (read: Belfast), leads a robbery at a linen mill to finance the organization's operations. Safe house operator Kathleen (Kathleen Ryan), whose unspoken love for Johnny is apparent to everyone but him, and his lieutenant Dennis (Robert Newton) predict that after nearly a year in prison and in hiding following his escape Johnny is no longer emotionally equipped to lead the raid. He brushes off their objections but, as predicted, Johnny suffers a breakdown during the getaway phase of the robbery and is assaulted by one of the mill's cashiers armed with a pistol. In the struggle, he kills the man and is mortally wounded himself then left behind by his fleeing comrades. Hearing the grave news, Kathleen searches for a way to rescue Johnny while he, delirious and slowly bleeding to death, struggles to hide out in the city backstreets and avoid a police dragnet. Amidst these dual story lines we encounter a number of colorful city dwellers and are introduced to their own conflicts. However, our prime concern is the fate of Johnny and Kathleen who are trapped in parallel downward spiraling trajectories edging ever nearer toward each other and ultimate destruction.
The film is based on F.L. Green's 1945 novel of the same name. Green was born in England but relocated to Belfast in 1934. After reading the novel, director Carol Reed travelled to Belfast to discuss a film version with the author and subsequently they worked on the script together. As part of an ultimately unsuccessful attempt by U.K. companies to secure major distribution of British prestige pictures in America after the war, this motion picture benefits from prestige level funding, an extended shooting schedule, and a genuine box office star in James Mason. According to John Hill, Professor of Media at Royal Holloway, University of London, and author of Cinema and Northern Ireland: Film, Culture and Politics (London: BFI Publishing, 2006), Odd Man Out was also the "first major fiction feature to deal with the 'troubles' in Northern Ireland since partition" (Hill 124). Hill's research places the picture within the rocky political and cultural context of post-war Northern Ireland--a context that the filmmakers are purposefully vague about in the movie even as they find creative ways to acknowledge it. For Hill, the "de-contextualizing aesthetic tends to reinforce previously existing views of the 'troubles' as largely inexplicable" (126). I would venture to add that the de-contextualization also tends to open the film up to a wider, universal appeal. Cinephiles don't necessarily have to hail from Ireland or be well-versed in the history and politics of the conflict between unionists and nationalists to be moved by the picture. In truth, both the history and the film itself fascinate me. So, while I continue reading Hill's excellent book I'll share eight things I admire about Odd Man Out...
1. Crosstown Traffic. In some parts of the film director Carol Reed appears to have been influenced by the documentary style realism affecting the look and feel of contemporary Italian neorealism and American semidocumentary crime dramas, and he shot some scenes of Odd Man Out on location in Belfast and around London. In the scene that provides the screencap above we follow a black car around the streets as it picks up Johnny and his comrades before the robbery at the mill. Shooting on the street means giving up some level of control. We can almost hear the director shouting at the man on the bicycle, "No! Don't look at the camera! Sir, don't look at the camera!...Ahh, CUT!"
2. A Poetic Vision of the North. If the daylight scenes of Belfast "a city of Northern Ireland" reflect a documentary style realism then by nightfall we discover Reed experimenting with a kind of poetic realism too. Casual fans of the pre-war French style (like me) might suspect some sections of Odd Man Out to be the work of famous set designer Alexandre Trauner because Reed and his team imagine a city of rain-soaked avenues, softly glowing windows, lonely figures, shiny wet cobblestones, and brick walls alternately drenched in pools of darkness and restrained light reminiscent of Trauner's and director Marcel Carne's version of La Havre in Le Quai des brumes (1938). The result is a mysterious, abundantly dark urban evironment that threatens to envelope Johnny and deepens our understanding of his sense of alienation and despair.
3. James Mason as Johnny McQueen. At one point in the film Kathleen says that she'll fend off the police inquiries by "giving them a dose of silence." But, if there's one nearly silent role in the film it's that of Johnny McQueen played by James Mason. As he spends the majority of this film alone or drifting in and out of consciousness Mason has to play worried, wounded, delirious, suffering, resisting, hopeless, and all the rest of the anti-hero's trials with little in the way of dialogue. A less talented actor wouldn't be able to hold our interest for the length of the film, but the result here is terrific. Aided and abetted by star power, Mason emotes with body, posture, facial expressions, eyes, and any number of small gestures...I didn't realize how much I've missed this style of acting since this blog turned the sync sound corner back in 1928 and everyone began talking all the time. :D
4. Euphemisms Galore. The great irony, and the great achievement, in the writing of Odd Man Out for the screen is that the story takes place within the political milieu of the "troubles" in Northern Ireland yet the conflict and those involved are not referred to directly. More, the film is all about a wounded Irish Reblican Army chief on the run in Belfast but the city and the IRA are not mentioned. An opening title scroll states that the film isn't about politics at all, and refers to the IRA only as "an illegal organization." As the film continues we find the screenwriters scratching their heads for more alternative ways to refer to it: "our organization in this city," "his friends," "headquarters," "your people," "the boys," "his own crowd," etc.
5. Not Exactly Our Gang. Midway through the picture, Johnny's lieutenant, the tough and clever Dennis, is searching the backstreets for his chief when he suddenly finds himself confronted by a rabble of noisy children who shake him down for money and cigarettes. When the big bad rebel soldier tells them to back off or he'll call the police they respond, "there ain't no police 'round here! Mister, give us a penny!" The scene is played for dark humor, but it recalls stories of poverty stricken children surviving post-war Europe in contemporary films like Germany Year Zero (1948) and Somewhere in Europe (1947).
6. The Streets of Northern Noir. In one of my favorite sequences from the film, Dennis draws the police after him to allow Johnny to avoid a barricade. The ensuing chase is filmed in expressionist style lighting with long shadows trailing after figures darting through alleyways at night (see image top of post). This sequence visually mines a rich dark vein of suspense that I find reminiscent of Fritz Lang's moody thriller M (1931). Notice how the fascinating shot above opens up screen space by breaking the frame into various horizontal and vertical spaces that imply height, width, and aid the illusion depth in the image. The leading lines work with the dynamic lighting to bring our eyes to the silhouetted policeman pursuing Dennis from the cobblestone street on the left side of the image. Meanwhile, vertical lines on the right side of the image lead our eyes up from the street to Dennis' own shadowy form running on the scaffold in the extreme right. These elements combine with the running actors and supply a sense of tense action and pursuit.
7. Tripping with Johnny. Not content with creating realistic views of Belfast, poetic images of that same city at night, or expressionistic chase sequences, Reed also experiments with revealing his anti-hero's damaged internal reality through chaotic jerky camera, extreme and even impossible perspectives, superimposed imagery, and canted camera in an increasingly bizarre series of hallucinations. Johnny's mental troubles range from a brief spell of disorientation in the car ride to the robbery that looks like an outtake from Rene Clair's Entr'act (1924) to a famous confrontation with talking bubbles in a puddle of beer much later in the film. I prefer an equally surreal scene in which the wounded protagonist is confronted by hallucinations of a mute Father Tom and a gallery of grotesque portraits. In response, the delirious Johnny recalls Father Tom's preaching and, in Mason's thunderous voice, recites some of the finest lines from the thirteenth chapter of Paul's First Epistle to the Corinthians.
8. Kathleen's Courage Equal to Desire (spoiler alert). The final fate of Johnny McQueen is decided not by the rebel chieftain himself, but by Kathleen. Throughout the film everyone Johnny runs across wants to use him to his own advantage; they help Johnny because they fear his organization or they refuse to help him because they fear the police. Only Kathleen wants to do something for him. She hints to Father Tom that she wants to protect Johnny in this world and beyond. As screen love affairs go theirs is an entirely off screen affair, and may only exist in her mind. They don't appear together as a couple until the final scene of the film and even then they consummate their relationship through an act of martyrdom. Kathleen's expressed desire to love and protect Johnny is matched by her courage to commit the ultimate act of sacrifice--a decision she makes for them both.
This post written by Thom Ryan
Copyright 2008 Thom Ryan Some rights reserved



Great choice for this year. I sought this out after hearing Steven Soderbergh rave about it on the Third Man commentary. What stayed with me the most was how Reed made the city McQueen's own private prison, a place where it seemed he could hide successfully, but never feel free.
Posted by: Adam Ross | 06 June 2008 at 06:41 PM
Thom, I've never seen this film but have wanted to because of a 2-page piece on it by Roman Polanski in Projections 4 1/2, (edited by John Boorman in association with Positif). Polanski calls this the film that had the biggest influence on him when he was young, and recalls seeing it in Cracow, where its Polish title was Those Not Needed Can Go. I look forward to finally seeing it.
Posted by: girish | 06 June 2008 at 06:51 PM
Adam, thanks. Y'know, that Soderbergh sounds like a wise man :P I just became a fan of this flick so I'm happy to read that you are too. I really like your prisoner-within-his-own-city theme because it does seem to be something Reed and Green are really striving for. Nearly everything and everyone in the city seem to be ambivalent about Johnny and his unnamed cause. Like the coachman who says, "I'm not for you, but I'm not against you either." It seems to be yet another way Reed and Green comment on the social/political context by not commenting on it.
Posted by: Thom | 06 June 2008 at 07:32 PM
Hi Girish. Thanks for the info on Polanski and the alternate title. I've only seen Repulsion (1965), Rosemary's Baby (1968), Chinatown (1974) and Frantic (1988) and don't recall an overt influence. But the theme of an outsider trapped in a hostile environment fuels Frantic and Repulsion (come to think of it, Rosemary too). I'll look for more connections when I watch his earlier films (if I can get a hold of them). I hope that you do get a chance to view Odd Man Out and post about it too.
Posted by: Thom | 06 June 2008 at 07:55 PM
Great choice! We just showed this at my theater and had a huge turnout. I absolutely love this movie. I especially love how (as you pointed out), for the most part, it's not about Johnny's adventures escaping or surviving, but about the moral quandary he poses to everyone he encounters. This prompts so many great performances from the supporting cast, especially a really stellar, watchful scene from Fay Compton as Rosie (the woman who's afraid her husband will come home and find him). And the "tripping" you point out is also there in the structure--as Johnny becomes more and more delirious, he winds up encountering more and more crazy people and situations, culminating in Lukey the maniac painter. And what an ending!
Posted by: mike | 06 June 2008 at 08:44 PM
Hey Mike. I kept thinking I'd seen a notice for an exhibition of this film but couldn't figure out where it was. I searched for somewhere 'round here, but no luck. I must have been thinking about the schedule you sent to me a while back. Glad to read it received a good turnout at your place.
I'm intrigued by your reading of the structure as a mirror on Johnny's deteriorating physical and mental conditions. I hadn't thought of that (though I did notice the weather going from clear to rain to snow by the end). Things certainly fall apart quickly for McQueen between afternoon tea and midnight, don't they? No wonder he hallucinates at one point about being back in prison and that this, certainly his worst day ever, has been just a dream.
Posted by: Thom | 06 June 2008 at 10:59 PM
"Mason emotes with body, posture, facial expressions, eyes, and any number of small gestures...I didn't realize how much I've missed this style of acting since this blog turned the sync sound corner back in 1928 and everyone began talking all the time." Funny, but so true. What an engrossing analysis of this film. Fascinating. Thanks.
Posted by: Jacqueline T Lynch | 07 June 2008 at 05:23 AM
Thank you Jacqueline. I wondered if you'd pick up on that. I really miss the late silent era pictures (what I wouldn't give for one more Borzage or Murnau) and the more physically expressive acting style. On imdb there's a bit of trivia that claims Mason considered this his favorite performance. I wonder if the small amount of lines had something to do with that?
Have you seen this one? If so, is there a write-up at your blog?
Posted by: Thom | 07 June 2008 at 09:57 AM
One of my all time favourites, I'm happy you chose it for 1947.
*Spoilers*
As for the Kathleen's decision in the end, I'm torn to how selfless it may be. It seems like the only logical conclusion, and she does afterall give up her life for him. However, the discussions between her and her grandmother reveal, at least for me, someone who is very naive, emotionally or otherwise. I think without being aware of it, she's using him as much as the others, although for very different reasons. The only character who strikes me as caring only for Johnny's best interests is Father Tom, although he's too meek to do much.
Brilliant film, and aparently Mason's own favourite performance.
Posted by: Justine | 08 June 2008 at 12:53 PM
That's an attractive point, Justine. It isn't exactly selfless if we consider that, in her mind, Kathleen gets exactly what she's after: Johnny himself--be it in life or in death.
Posted by: Thom | 08 June 2008 at 01:13 PM
Hello again, Thom. No, there's no write-up on this film on my blog. I have to admit, I've never seen the film, or at the very least I may have seen scenes from it. Vague memory. Back in the days before VCR, I guess.
Posted by: Jacqueline T Lynch | 10 June 2008 at 04:54 AM
Now if only someone would re-release Reed's third *great* film, OUTCAST OF THE ISLANDS.
Posted by: C. Jerry | 10 June 2008 at 04:29 PM
Count me among those who haven't seen this film, though I've wanted to for a long time. Years ago when I went to the library and xeroxed all the issues of Sight & Sound magazine in which they printed the results of their 10-year poll, I remember Odd Man Out would always get lots of mentions on individual critics' lists (particularly in the first poll in 1952, where I think it might have been mentioned more often than any other Reed film) but never quite enough to crack the collective top ten.
So far I've only seen (in order of personal preference) the Fallen Idol, the Third Man and Oliver!
How serious are you about wanting to see another Borzage? 'Cause he made a great one in 1948: Moonrise, and it's potentially available on VHS. Not silent, of course, but bears his visual style.
Posted by: Brian | 11 June 2008 at 12:58 AM
This is one of the benefits of blogging: lots of recommendations for future viewing.
C. Jerry - I'd really like to see Outcast of the Islands. In fact, you've piqued my curiosity. I'm looking at my small Conrad collection right now to see if I have the original story on the bookshelf...nope. Think I'll stop at the library this week...
Brian - I remain impressed by your knowledge of cinema. Not only do you suggest a Borzage I've never even heard of, but it just happens to be from the very year I'm writing about next! All right, I'm on the hunt... Oh, and The Fallen Idol is in my queue too, thank you.
Posted by: Thom | 12 June 2008 at 07:32 AM